Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original Research Articles

Vol. 11 (2023): Publicación Anual Continua

El Disminuidor keynesiano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2023.v11.1462
Enviado
mayo 31, 2022
Publicado
2023-08-24

Resumen

El multiplicador keynesiano del gasto se considera comúnmente un mecanismo que amplifica la política fiscal o monetaria expansiva. Sin embargo, una vez que los supuestos en los que se basa el multiplicador se aplican a la clásica ecuación cuantitativa, resulta evidente que el multiplicador keynesiano es mucho más pesimista a este respecto que la ecuación cuantitativa. A la luz de esta comparación, tiene mucho más sentido hablar del "disminuidor" keynesiano que del "multiplicador". La razón del sesgo pesimista del multiplicador puede detectarse mejor si se hace la distinción entre una medida de política expansiva de una sola vez y una permanente. Es sólo por este sesgo pesimista que el "multiplicador" keynesiano puede ser usado para justificar programas de gasto gubernamental permanentes.

Citas

  1. ABAY-NEUBAUER, Julius. Der wirtschaftliche Kreislauf auf geldlicher und sachlicher Grundlage (II). Journal of Contextual Economics, Berlin, v. 81, n. 6, p. 81-99, 1961. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.81.6.81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.81.6.81
  2. ABAY-NEUBAUER, Julius. Investitionen und Wachstum. Journal of Contextual Economics, Berlin, v. 85, n. 5, p. 557-573, 1965. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.85.5.557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.85.5.557
  3. ACKLEY, Gardner. The multiplier time period: money, inventories, and flexibility. The American Economic Review, Nashville, v. 41, n. 3, p. 350-368, 1951.
  4. ALFORD, R. F. G. A taxonomic note on the multiplier and income velocity. Economica, Chichester, v. 27, n. 105, p. 53-62, 1960. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2551427
  5. ANGELL, James W. Investment and business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1941.
  6. ASIMAKOPULOS, Athanasios. Finance, liquidity, saving, and investment. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Philadelphia, v. 9, n. 1, p. 79-90, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1986.11489601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1986.11489601
  7. BRAUN, Eduard; ERLEI, Mathias. Über die Relevanz der Entstehungsgeschichte von Krisen. Jahrbuch Normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik, [s. l.], v. 13, p. 241-267, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.plurale-oekonomik-hamburg.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Braun-Erlei-2015-Ueber_die_Relevanz_der_Entstehungsgeschichte_von_Krisen.pdf Acesso em: 10 maio 2023.
  8. CHICK, Victoria. The multiplier and finance. In: HARCOURT, Geoffrey C.; RIACH, Peter A. (org.). A second edition of the general theory. Abingdon: Routledge, 1997. v. 1, p. 164-182.
  9. COLANDER, David. Teaching Keynes in the 21st century. Journal of Economic Education, Philadelphia, v. 30, n. 4, p. 364-372, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909596093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909596093
  10. COTTRELL, Allin. Endogenous money and the multiplier. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Philadelphia, v. 17, n. 1, p. 111-120, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1994.11490012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1994.11490012
  11. CULHAM, James; KING, John E. Horizontalists and verticalists after 25 years. Review of Keynesian Economics, Cheltenham, v. 1, n. 4, p. 391-405, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2013.04.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2013.04.02
  12. DALZIEL, Paul. The keynesian multiplier, liquidity preference, and endogenous money. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Philadelphia, v. 18, n. 3, p. 311-331, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490075
  13. ELLIS, Howard S. Notes on the demand for money. Kyklos, Chichester, v. 15, n. 1, p. 216-230, 1962. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1962.tb00058.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1962.tb00058.x
  14. GECHERT, Sebastian. Der Multiplikator in einer Kreditgeldwirtschaft. In: KROMPHARDT, Jürgen (ed.). Keynes' general theory nach 75 jahren. Marburg: Metropolis, 2012. p. 163-186.
  15. HARTWIG, Jochen. Three views of the multiplier. In: ROCHON, Louis-Philippe; GNOS, Claude (ed.). The keynesian multiplier. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008. p. 9-31.
  16. HAYWOOD, Charles F. Hoarding, velocity, and financial intermediaries. Southern Economic Journal, Hoboken, v. 26, n. 1, p. 33-43, 1959. https://doi.org/10.2307/1055865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1055865
  17. KAHN, Richard Ferdinand. The relation of home investment to unemployment. The Economic Journal, Oxford, v. 41, n. 162, p. 173-198, 1931. https://doi.org/10.2307/2223697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2223697
  18. KEYNES, John Maynard. The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York: Macmillan and Co., 1936.
  19. KRAUS, Otto. Konjunktur und Beschäftigung. München: Max Hueber, 1954.
  20. KRUGMAN, Paul. Mr Keynes and the moderns. VoxEU, London, 21 jun. 2011a. Disponível em: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/mr-keynes-and-moderns Acesso em: 10 maio 2023.
  21. KRUGMAN, Paul. The profession and the crisis. Eastern Economic Journal, London, v. 37, p. 307-312, 2011b. https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2011.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2011.8
  22. LAMBSDORFF, Johann Graf. Savings and investments: an old debate in times of trouble. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Philadelphia, v. 33, n. 4, p. 645-666, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477330406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477330406
  23. LEIJONHUFVUD, Axel. Did Keynes mean anything? Rejoinder to Yeager. Cato Journal, Washington, DC, v. 8, n. 1, p. 209-217, 1988.
  24. LUTZ, Friedrich August. The outcome of the saving-investment discussion. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Cary, v. 52, n. 4, p. 588-614, 1938. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885035
  25. LUTZ, Vera. Multiplier and velocity analysis: a marriage. Economica, Chichester, v. 22, n. 85, p. 29-44, 1955. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2551727
  26. MAHR, Alexander. Einige Grundprobleme der Theorie der wachsenden Wirtschaft. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Wien, v. 16, n. 3/4, p. 301-323, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01338758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01338758
  27. MAHR, Alexander. National money income and real market product. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Wien, v. 24, n. 1/2, p. 1-21, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01319891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01319891
  28. MAYER, Thomas. Multiplier and Velocity Analysis: An Evaluation. Journal of Political Economy v. 72. N. 6, p. 563-574, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1086/258963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/258963
  29. MEADE, James. The keynesian revolution. In: KEYNES, Milo (ed.). Essays on John Maynard Keynes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1975. p. 82-88.
  30. MEADE, James. The relation of Mr Meade's relation to Kahn's multiplier. The Economic Journal, Oxford, v. 103, n. 418, p. 664-665, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234538
  31. MOORE, Basil J. Horizontalists and verticalists: the macroeconomics of credit money. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  32. MOORE, Basil J. The demise of the keynesian multiplier revisited. In: ROCHON, Louis-Philippe; GNOS, Claude (ed.). The keynesian multiplier. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008. p. 120-126.
  33. MOORE, Basil J. The demise of the keynesian multiplier: a reply to Cottrell. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Philadelphia, v. 17, n. 1, p. 121-133, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1994.11490013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1994.11490013
  34. PALLEY, Thomas I. The twin circuits: aggregate demand and the expenditure multiplier in a monetary economy. Review of Radical Political Economics, Thousand Oaks, v. 30, n. 3, p. 91-101, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/048661349803000310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/048661349803000310
  35. PARGUEZ, Alain. The intertemporal transmission of money in the endogenous monetary economy. In: ROCHON, Louis-Philippe; GNOS, Claude (ed.). The keynesian multiplier. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008. p. 106-119.
  36. ROCHON, Louis-Philippe. The creation and circulation of endogenous money: a circuit dynamique approach. Journal of Economic Issues, New York, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1-21, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1999.11506132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1999.11506132
  37. ROTHBARD, Murray Newton. Man, economy, and state: a treatise on economic principles. With power and market: government and the economy. 2nd. ed. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009. Disponível em: https://cdn.mises.org/man_economy_and_state_with_power_and_market_3.pdf Acesso em: 10 maio 2023.
  38. SAMUELSON, Paul A. Fiscal policy and income determination. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Cary, v. 56, n. 4, p. 575-605, 1942. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1883411
  39. SMITH, Dan Throop. Deficits and depressions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1936.
  40. TREVITHICK, James Anthony. The monetary prerequisites for the multiplier: an adumbration of the crowding-out hypothesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford, v. 18, p. 77-90, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035264
  41. TSIANG, Sho-Chieh. Liquidity preference and loanable funds theories, multiplier and velocity analyses: a synthesis. The American Economic Review, Nashville, v. 46, n. 4, p. 539-564, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-701721-1.50007-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-701721-1.50007-7
  42. VEIT, Otto. Reale Theorie des Geldes. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1966.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.