Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original Research Articles

Vol. 8 (2020): Yearly Continuous Publication

The Privatization of the Amazon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2020.v8.1270
Submitted
January 10, 2020
Published
2020-05-17

Abstract

This article explores the privatization of the Amazon. Based on a theoretical framework founded upon the tragedy of the commons, economic calculation, and dynamic efficiency, an analysis of the consequences of privatization is developed, trying to assess the environmental issue and how forests and pollution would be affected. Economic problems, such as the costs of pollution, short-term goals, and scarcity of resources are
addressed. Sustainable alternatives for logging, and how privatization is an engine to carry out such measures, are exposed. The privatization of the forest is contrasted against the current environmental policy, focusing on the demarcation of indigenous lands and its consequences. From an economic and ethical point of view, defending a legal framework of strong protection of property rights, it is demonstrated that privatization is the best solution for conflict resolution and the maintenance of the Amazon rainforest.

References

  1. ANDERSON, T.; LEAL, D. Free Market Environmentalism. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
  2. BLOCK, W. Economics and the Environment: Environmental Problems, Private Property Rights Solutions. Canada: The Fraser Institute, 1990.
  3. CARREIRO, O. R. Las Políticas de la Industrialización. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 2017.
  4. DAVIES, S. Foundation for Economic Education, 2004. Disponible: https://fee.org/articles/the-great-horsemanure-crisis-of-1894/. Acceso en: 30 nov 2019.
  5. ENVIROMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDEX. Global metrics for the environment: Ranking countryperformance on high-priority environmental issues. 2018. Disponible en: https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/downloads/epi2018policymakerssummaryv01.pdf. Acceso en: 1 dic 2019.
  6. FUNAI. Fundação Nacional do Índio. Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública, s/f. Disponible en: http://www.funai.gov.br/index.php/quem-somos. Acceso em: 02 dic 2019.
  7. FUNDO AMAZÔNIA. Junio de 2019. FUNDO AMAZÔNIA. Disponible en: http://www.fundoamazonia.gov.br/export/sites/default/pt/.galleries/documentos/rafa/RAFA_2018_port.pdf. Acceso en: 2 dic 2019.
  8. HARDIN, G. Tragedy of the Commons. Floresce: Science, 1968.
  9. HEUSER, S. The Effectiveness of Enviromental Policies on Reducing Deforestation in tha Brazilian Amazon. Maastricht: Boekenplan, 2018.
  10. HOPPE, H.-H. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism: economics, politics, and ethics. Las Vegas: University of Nevada, 1989.
  11. HUERTA DE SOTO, J. La Teoría de la Eficiencia Dinámica. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, v.1, n.1, 2004.
  12. HUETA DE SOTO, J. Socialismo, Cálculo Económico y Función Empresarial. Madrid: Unión Editorial, 2005.
  13. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE. Informações Ambientais. Disponible en: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/informacoes-ambientais/geomorfologia/15819-amazonia-legal.html?=&t=o-que-e. Acceso en: 31 nov 2019.
  14. KIRZNER, I. Competition and Emtrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
  15. LE TOURNEAU, F. M. The Sustainability Challenges of Indigenous territories. Amsterdã: Elsevier, 2015.
  16. LOCKE, J. The Two Treatises of Government. London: A. Millar, 1689.
  17. MISES, L. v. Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn: Mises Institute, 1920.
  18. MISES, L. v. Teoría e Historia. Madrid: Unión Editorial, 1975.
  19. MISES, L. v. La Acción Humana: Tratado de Economía. Madrid: Unión Editorial, 2011.
  20. OSTROM, E. El Gobierno de los Bienes Comunes. La Evolución de las Instituciones de Acción Colectiva. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2000.
  21. PERSSON, U.; ALPÍZAR, F. Conditional Cash Transfers and Payments for Environmental Services — A Conceptual
  22. Framework for Explaining and Judging Differences in Outcomes. World Development, v.43, p. 124–137, 2013.
  23. ROTHBARD, M. Power & Market: Government and the Economy. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and Mcmeel, Inc., 1970.
  24. ROTHBARD, M. Law, Property Rights, and Air Polution. Cato Journal, v.2, n.01, p. 55-99, 1982.
  25. SAYER, J. et al. The Implications for Biodiversity Conservation of Decentralised Forest Resources Management. IUCN and WWF, 2004.
  26. SCOTT, A. Natural Resources: The Economics of Conservation. Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1983.
  27. UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Declaration. 2008. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf. Acceso en: 1 dic 2019.
  28. WUNDER, S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation biology, 2007.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.